Motion Picture Commissar of the Year

For those who saw the signs of hatred as our cars drove in tonight, I think it’s a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect on their great shame and their shame in their grandchildren’s eyes if they continue that support.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and I am sure the vast, vast majority of those who work in the industry agree with Penn, but how many fall into step because they know they would never work in Hollywood again if they didn’t? There was no real thought on the subject expressed by Penn.  The issue has been thoroughly sentimentalized.

Unfortunately, there was some hateful behavior at the awards to fuel the credibility of Penn’s remarks.  Even so, Penn knows the difference between the kooks and those who don’t want homosexuality shoved down their throats and the throats of their children.

How bout some real charity on both sides.

Advertisements

Dangerous Dad

davidparker.jpgDavid Parker is a man’s man, a go-getter and a defender of the innocence of his children. He has not counted the cost, but has gone to the ends of the earth to make sure that the pro-gay marriage, homosexual teachers in Massachusetts don’t have the right to indoctrinate children in public schools into the homosexual lifestyle.

If you doubt that the morals of children are being corrupted via the gay lifestyle by homosexual teachers in Massachusetts where same-sex marriage is legal, then let me attest to the fact that it is happening. Teachers are instructing young children in the mechanics of homosexual acts. I would be happy to provide evidence of the fact to anyone interested. I will not post the link here, as sometimes young people frequent this blog.

Here is part of the article linked to above about David Parker’s plight:

A Massachusetts father who was handcuffed and arrested after objecting to teachers and school managers indoctrinating his 5-year-old son in the homosexual lifestyle will be appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn his case because of the “national significance” of the precedent.

“[Unless the case is overturned,] it now would allow teachers in elementary schools to influence children into any views they wanted to, behind the backs of parents, to a captive audience, and against the will of the parents if need be,” David Parker told WND. Continue reading