<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hope for Marriage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Christ and the Church &#171; Mary Victrix</title>
		<link>http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[For Christ and the Church &#171; Mary Victrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maryvictrix.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Christ and the&#160;Church  Robert brought my attention to an international organization known as the Corpus Christianorum, which is a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christ and the&nbsp;Church  Robert brought my attention to an international organization known as the Corpus Christianorum, which is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maryvictrix.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, I forgot the URL - http://www.corpuschristianum.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I forgot the URL &#8211; <a href="http://www.corpuschristianum.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.corpuschristianum.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer A.</title>
		<link>http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maryvictrix.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  This is a great article even if it&#039;s still somewhat liberal.  I think it shows that some of the liberal-minded folks are starting to see the folly in their recent ideas.  First of all, pursuing a career while you leave young children to be raised by *care-givers* is not producing people who have a decent foundation of morals and/or a decent sense of security.   Granted, I am not criticizing those who truly must work to put meals on the table, etc.   But, I&#039;m thinking that the vast majority of dual-income families don&#039;t HAVE to be dual income ... it&#039;s a choice.  And, it&#039;s a choice that women have been told is the BETTER choice.  In fact, now that it&#039;s been a reality for so many years, men who are the sole bread-winners feel an unusually high sense of pressure ... the corporate culture lays people off regularly so there is no sense of job security which weighs very heavily on a man when his wife is not employed to carry them over such a hump should it arise.  It is a slippery slope that we have been sliding down on for years.

It has also been the biggest *encourager* of artificial birth control because, let&#039;s face it, the woman needs to get back to WORK.  And, who can afford day-care for 8 kids?  So, it&#039;s been feeding into all of this now for quite some time.  yet, as law-suits and shows have shown some of the neglect and abuse in day-care centers or even in privately hired nannies, families are left with the fact that this is TRULY a selfish decision to put our children in these situations.  Now if statistics like this can be published FRONT AND CENTER in the newspapers that divorce is higher in two-income families and crime is higher in kids of single parents, THEN I think we just might see a positive change.  Maybe I&#039;m being naive but I have to believe that people, in the end, want to do the right thing ... they just get duped at times as to WHAT that right thing is.  (They are not looking to the Church for their guidance ... and the Church isn&#039;t always consistent with her guidance.)

Of course, I didn&#039;t even comment on the parts of the article that is addressing the homosexual desires to marriage ... that&#039;s another whole mess.  But, as the article mentioned, children need a mother and a father ... not care-givers or a loving couple of some sort.   Enough data really needs to get collected on the outcome of children from all of these different environments before we can appeal to people&#039;s sense of logic.  It seems we cannot appeal to their sense of morals anymore ... so I keep thinking that we need to get through their sense of logic and then show how it connects to Church teaching and hope they will come home through the back door.  Again, maybe I&#039;m being naive, but without hope it would all be way too depressing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This is a great article even if it&#8217;s still somewhat liberal.  I think it shows that some of the liberal-minded folks are starting to see the folly in their recent ideas.  First of all, pursuing a career while you leave young children to be raised by *care-givers* is not producing people who have a decent foundation of morals and/or a decent sense of security.   Granted, I am not criticizing those who truly must work to put meals on the table, etc.   But, I&#8217;m thinking that the vast majority of dual-income families don&#8217;t HAVE to be dual income &#8230; it&#8217;s a choice.  And, it&#8217;s a choice that women have been told is the BETTER choice.  In fact, now that it&#8217;s been a reality for so many years, men who are the sole bread-winners feel an unusually high sense of pressure &#8230; the corporate culture lays people off regularly so there is no sense of job security which weighs very heavily on a man when his wife is not employed to carry them over such a hump should it arise.  It is a slippery slope that we have been sliding down on for years.</p>
<p>It has also been the biggest *encourager* of artificial birth control because, let&#8217;s face it, the woman needs to get back to WORK.  And, who can afford day-care for 8 kids?  So, it&#8217;s been feeding into all of this now for quite some time.  yet, as law-suits and shows have shown some of the neglect and abuse in day-care centers or even in privately hired nannies, families are left with the fact that this is TRULY a selfish decision to put our children in these situations.  Now if statistics like this can be published FRONT AND CENTER in the newspapers that divorce is higher in two-income families and crime is higher in kids of single parents, THEN I think we just might see a positive change.  Maybe I&#8217;m being naive but I have to believe that people, in the end, want to do the right thing &#8230; they just get duped at times as to WHAT that right thing is.  (They are not looking to the Church for their guidance &#8230; and the Church isn&#8217;t always consistent with her guidance.)</p>
<p>Of course, I didn&#8217;t even comment on the parts of the article that is addressing the homosexual desires to marriage &#8230; that&#8217;s another whole mess.  But, as the article mentioned, children need a mother and a father &#8230; not care-givers or a loving couple of some sort.   Enough data really needs to get collected on the outcome of children from all of these different environments before we can appeal to people&#8217;s sense of logic.  It seems we cannot appeal to their sense of morals anymore &#8230; so I keep thinking that we need to get through their sense of logic and then show how it connects to Church teaching and hope they will come home through the back door.  Again, maybe I&#8217;m being naive, but without hope it would all be way too depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://maryvictrix.com/2008/03/06/hope-for-marriage/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maryvictrix.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for all your posts on chivalry! 

I am not sure if you are familiar with the organization Corpus Christianum but it is another association which promotes prayer for the family, Christendom, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all your posts on chivalry! </p>
<p>I am not sure if you are familiar with the organization Corpus Christianum but it is another association which promotes prayer for the family, Christendom, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
